Alternate
Product Selection
DEI Galvanic Isolators are
typically sized to match the steady-state AC rating
of the shore power service, which typically also
provides an appropriate associated AC fault rating.
If a higher AC fault current rating is needed, the
following alternate methods may be used to select an
isolator rating and model.
Alternate Product Selection Method - AC Fault Current
Exposure level:
The grounding conductor of an AC voltage system is
designed to carry the full phase-to-ground fault
current in the event of a fault (e.g. shorted
conductors or motor winding failures). Placed in
this grounding conductor, the DEI device would be
exposed to the entire available fault current, and
should be rated for such.
Calculation
method: The full available fault current from
the shore power system is the value that we need to
size for. The methods for sizing include (in order
of preference):
a) using the
breaker clearing curve for the circuit in question,
b) comparison of the grounding conductor size
to fault withstand graphs for cables, or
c) calculation of the fault current at the
shore transformer (worst case).
The three methods are
described below:
a) Comparison to
fuse/breaker clearing curves
If a fault occurs
within the shore power cord up to the boat’s main
breaker panel, then the shore breaker will clear the
fault and ideally the shore breaker current/time
trip ratings would be used. However, realistically
sizing to the main breaker on the boat will
adequately define the needed Galvanic Isolator fault
rating. The breaker “total clearing time” curve
should be used, and a DEI device rating should be
chosen to exceed these curve values. On a clearing
curve graph, the DEI device ratings should appear to
the right of the breaker clearing curve. If you
would like DEI assistance, please provide breaker
clearing curves, or provide data so that we can find
the curves in our library or on the web, including
the breaker manufacturer’s name, model number, and
ratings or settings.
b) Comparison of the
grounding conductor to fault withstand graphs for cables
Device ratings can
also be indirectly estimated by comparison to the AC
fault capability of the conductor used on the
circuit of interest. This is based on the assumption
that the conductor was originally sized correctly
for the available fault current, and will generally
result in a conservative selection. Determine the
grounding conductor size used in your shore power
cord, then compare the current/time values in the
withstand graph to the DEI device, choosing a
product rating that approximates or exceeds the
conductor rating. As this is an indirect method of
fault sizing, it may be appropriate in some cases to
have a DEI product rated below the conductor
withstand value, if other factors, such as total
conductor length, indicate that the fault current is
substantially lower than the maximum conductor
withstand.
c) Calculations based on the
source fault current at the transformer
Unless the user has
fault data for the exact circuit of interest, a
conservative estimate can be achieved by starting
with the fault current at the marina transformer. If
desired, further refinement can be done by
calculating current reductions due to conductor
impedance due to the length of the service. This
method is most useful for smaller electrical
facilities; use at larger facilities may provide
overly conservative values. Because the data needed
will not likely be readily apparent, except to a
site electrician, the other methods of sizing are
recommended first.
The maximum fault
current available at the transformer terminals is
determined by the following formula, using data from
the transformer nameplate, which can be supplied by
a site engineer.
|
Secondary
full load current = |
Single-phase
transformer kVA |
|
Secondary kV |
or
|
Secondary
full load current = |
Three-phase
transformer kVA |
|
(Secondary
kV)(√3) |
then
|
Secondary
fault current = |
Secondary
full load current x 100 |
|
Percent
transformer impedance |
This is the maximum
fault current at the transformer, which will be
reduced by conductor impedance. This reduction can
be estimated using wire characteristics for various
cross-sections and lengths. Please contact Farwest
for additional assistance.

|